If you can not view this page properly, please use Firefox® to browse this page again.

Friday, July 27, 2007

Orang Asli battle to hold ancestral lands

www.malaysiakini.com

Just before Semah Ah Yin's great-grandfather Atok Mawai died, he asked that his body to be left by a nearby waterfall so it could to be carried away by a flood to his next life.

The waterfall and river in northern Perak state, where he performed ritualistic ceremonies, became a sacred site for the indigenous Semai people living in nearby Kampung Chang village.

It marks the boundary of lushly-forested ancestral land held by the Semai for generations - and which the state government is now eyeing for development.

The battle for the Semai's cherished forests is just one of many cases being fought by peninsular Malaysia's indigenous Orang Asli to retain control over their traditional lands.

With 18 ethnic sub-groups, the Orang Asli number only 150,000 or 0.6 percent of Malaysia's population of almost 27 million people.

They are among the country's poorest citizens, most making their living from agriculture and fishing.

As development pressures in Malaysia increase, Orang Asli are being squeezed in land grabs by state governments.

Unwanted botanical garden

Earlier this year, Kampung Chang villagers fought off a bid by Perak to use part of their land for a 200-hectare botanical park, a project they say would only line the pockets of contractors and the government.

"Other people will benefit from this park, but not the village people," said Kampung Chang elder Nunek Kamin, 71.

Without warning, bulldozers appeared in February to tear down trees and make way for a carpark. They cleared a road of red earth before public exposure of the project and lobbying by the Semai led to a temporary stand-down.

Crouching by the rushing waters of the waterfall, Semah, 51, said the area is still considered sacred because her great-grandfather, a shaman of some renown in the area, used to perform ceremonies there.

Rizuan Tempek, 28, a local community activist, said the Orang Asli fear that even if the botanical garden development is defeated, something else will come.

"We're really worried about that," Rizuan said.

Orang Asli can use ancestral land as well as the timber and other resources on it. However, state governments say they have legal ownership and insist they need not pay compensation for claiming it.

"Orang Asli lands are the cheapest. And of course they are the last frontier, the last nice areas around," said Colin Nicholas, coordinator for the Centre for Orang Asli Concerns, which champions their interests.

Historic ruling

Indigenous people have been resettled to make way for highways, buildings, golf courses and plantations. State governments give them smaller farming lands and houses in return.

The president of the Malaysian Bar Council, Ambiga Sreenevasan, said: "People are just walking in and doing what they like" because the Orang Asli do not have land titles.

But a growing number of villages are now resorting to legal action in a bid to stop encroachment on native customary land.

Thirteen cases are currently being heard by courts in peninsular Malaysia or are being prepared, said Nicholas, who is helping with them.

In eastern Malaysia on Borneo island, the states of Sarawak and Sabah recognise native customary rights but are flouting them, he said, adding that dozens of land rights cases are being fought there.

"It's the last resort, because they have protested, they have spoken to the authorities, negotiated, dialogued," he said.

In an historic ruling in 2002, a court found that members of the Temuan tribe were unlawfully evicted from their ancestral land in central Selangor state to make way for a highway to the Kuala Lumpur International Airport.

The court ordered compensation payments but the government and other parties have appealed to the Federal Court, the nation's highest.

With its ruling expected later this year, the Federal Court will determine native land rights once and for all, mirroring similar decisions in Australia and Canada, said Cyrus Das, a lawyer who represents the Temuan.

"This is a test case on whether the interests of the Orang Asli over customary land is merely a right of usage of the land or if it also includes a proprietary interest in the land," said Das.

Sustainable development

Land disputes are battles for resources but also an attempt by Orang Asli to retain their identities, which are intimately tied to their land, as Malaysia tries to integrate them into broader society and argues they must move with the times.

"We want the Orang Asli to be part of Malaysia. We don't want them to be a minority group," said an official from the Department of Orang Asli Affairs.

But Orang Asli and activists argue the fates of indigenous communities are being dictated by the government, while encroachment and resettlement are threatening their culture.

Orang Asli say they are not against progress but they want to be consulted, and they want sustainable development.

Rizuan, of Kampung Chang, said Orang Asli want to directly benefit from development and business projects on their land, whose profits are usually absorbed by middlemen.

Communities also want to be trained to control their own projects such as palm oil plantations, he said.

"It's not that we are stupid and can't learn," he said. "We are not fighting development. We are just fighting and struggling so that the government knows what kind of development we want."

- AFP

Academics on mission to conquer fear

http://www.malaysiakini.com

The nation’s campuses are still in the grip of fear. However, a group of academics are seeking to conquer it with their bold campaign against the Universiti Akujanji - a document pledging loyalty to the government which all students and academics are required to sign.

Led by Dr Syed Husin Ali (left) and Dr Lim Teck Ghee (right) - two former professors at Universiti Malaya, the country’s leading higher educational institution - the group has enlisted 38 of their colleagues to endorse a petition against the Akujanji.

The petition, which described the loyalty pledge as a “major deterrent to the healthy development of the universities” and demanded its immediate revocation, has been submitted to the government.

“The Akujanji has not only inculcated a culture of fear, passivity and uncritical thinking in the campuses. It has also eroded the fundamental right of freedom of association and expression that is so important to protect and enhance if our nation is to advance,” said a statement signed by the two former top academics.

It added that the Akujanji is antithetical to the development of the country’s universities and to the quality of teaching and scholarship.

Names not to be published

The list of endorsees appeared to prove their case. Of the 40 academics who gave their backing to the petition, 29 are no longer teaching at their respective educational institutions. [See full list below]

“The endorsers include many current serving academic staff from the nation's public universities, including some presently undertaking sabbatical and higher studies programs abroad. They have written to express support of the petition but have requested that their names not be published,” said the statement.

The petitioners said that many present university staff members were unable to include their names on the list “for fear of victimisation by the authorities”.

Among the big names who endorsed the petition is former deputy vice-chancellor at Universiti Malaya, Drs Abu Bakar A Hamid.

Those endorsees who are still at working at the nation’s universities are professors Dr Norchaya Talib, Dr Loh Wei Leng, associate professors Dr Azmi Sharom, Dr Terence Gomez (photo) and Dr Rosli Omar (all Universiti Malaya), professors Dr Wan Abdul Manan Wan Muda, Dr Francis Loh Kok Wah and associate professor Dr Khoo Boo Teik (Universiti Sains Malaysia), lecturers Dr Mohamed Aslam Haneef and Nur Barizah Abu Bakar (International Islamic University Malaysia) and associate research fellow Wong Chin Huat (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia).

According to the petition organisers, one of the endorsers has lamented that the "shackling the minds of academics only makes eunuchs of our children's teachers”.

“We hope that the government can rise above narrow and self-serving political interests and do the right thing in revoking the Akujanji requirement.

“Failure to do so will only further undermine the ability and willingness of our academic community to engage in critical and independent thinking and scholarship that can make the difference to the building of an intellectually robust and progressive country,” added the joint press statement which was released today.

Reinstate sacked lecturers

The petition said that the requirement of loyalty to the government, which is found only in a few repressive university systems in the world, has stifled academic freedom in Malaysia “to an unprecedented extent”.

It called for on the government to reinstate Dr Azly Rahman, Dr Mutiara Mohamad - both of whom were lecturers at the Universiti Utara Malaysia - and other academicians who have been dismissed as a result of their opposition to the Akujanji.

Azly (photo), who is currently teaching in the United States along with his wife, Mutiara, writes a weekly column for independent news website malaysiakini.

“Similarly, others who have suffered in their career development due to the Akujanji should have their cases reviewed and should be provided with justice and redress. These are our academic prisoners of conscience who have been unjustly victimised and whose continued exclusion is a black mark against academia and our democratic system and values.”

In addition to the academics, 46 non-governmental organisations have also endorsed the petition.

Since 2002, all civil servants and local university students and staff are required to sign the Akujanji.


Sample of the Akujanji document

40学者45民间团体连署
疾呼撤消大学操守协议书

http://www.merdekareview.com/

【本刊庄迪澎撰述】40名国立大学的离休及现职学术人员及45个民间团体,响应两名前马来亚大学教授林德义及赛胡先阿里的号召,连署撤销大学《行为操守协议书》请愿书,疾呼政府撤销自2002年开始执行的这项作业。

连署的40名学者以离休者居多,共有28人,除了林德义及赛胡先阿里之外,还有现任槟州行政议员杜乾焕(国大副教授)、全妇女组织副主席吴春心(博大副教授)、谢文庆(理大教授)、佐翰沙拉瓦纳姆都(Johan Sarawanamuttu,理大教授)、现任民主行动党国际与非政府事务秘书拉玛沙米P. Ramasamy)、阿布巴加哈密(Abu Bakar A. Hamid,马大教授、副校长)及法立斯诺(Farish Noor)等。

连署的现职国立大学学者则有理大教授罗国华、副教授邱武德、马大副教授哥梅兹(Terence Gomez)、副教授阿兹米沙伦(Azmi Sharom)、国大教授旺阿都玛南(Wan Abdul Manan Wan Muda)、副研究员黄进发、国际回教大学讲师莫哈末阿斯兰(Mohamed Aslam Haneef)、诺巴里扎(Nur Barizah Abu Bakar)等。

连署的45个民间团体则包括马来西亚人民之声(Suaram)、森美兰中华大会堂、吉隆坡暨雪兰莪中华大会堂民权委员会、马六甲中华大会堂青年团、马来西亚回教青年阵线(Abim)、国民醒觉运动(Aliran)、维护媒体独立撰稿人联盟、森美兰华校校友会联合会、林连玉基金会、马来西亚选民联盟(Malvu)、全国人权协会(Hakam)、马大学术人员协会(PKAUM)、马来西亚华校董事联合会总会(董总)及马来西亚华校教师会总会(教总)等。

马来西亚政府自2002年开始在大学执行《行为操守协议书》,教职员及大学都得签署这本文件,宣誓效忠政府。马来西亚北方大学阿兹里拉曼(Dr Azly Rahman)及慕蒂雅拉莫哈末(Dr Mutiara Mohamad)因不愿签署《行为操守协议书》而遭大学解雇。

林德义及赛胡先阿里是在本月初号召这项连署运动,连署工作仍在进行中;愿意连署的学术人员必须同时发送确认电邮给赛胡先阿里(husinsa23@yahoo.com)及林德义(tglim1@gmail.com)。

撤销大学行为操守协议书请愿书

我们――下列连署人――乃前任及现任大学职员及公民社会组织,谨此促请政府立即撤销《行为操守协议书》(Akujanji)。

这种要求效忠政府的做法――全球只有少数压迫性的大学系统才有――对我国学术自由的遏制,程度之深乃史无前例。它也在大学校园了营造了一种畏惧、顺从及无批判能力的文化,这与大学的发展及教学与学术品质背道而驰。

政府领导人,包括首相在内,曾呼吁大学接受挑战,提升学术水平,产生品质优秀的教学与研究,以帮助国家实现2020年宏愿,包括营造一个成熟、开放、科学及进步的社会。《行为操守协议书》恰恰是本地大学应对这项挑战的重大障碍。

还遭无理解雇者以公道

职是之故,我们促请政府恢复阿兹里拉曼(Dr Azly Rahman)、慕蒂雅拉莫哈末(Dr Mutiara Mohamad) 及其他因反对《行为操守协议书》而遭解职的学术人员的职务。同理,其他人的事业发展因《行为操守协议书》而遭受挫的人,他们的个案也应该重新检讨,还以公 道及补偿。他们遭受不公正的迫害,是我们学术界的良心囚犯;他们继续遭受排挤,则是学术界及民主制度与价值的污点。(编案:阿兹里拉曼及慕蒂雅拉莫哈末曾 任北方大学教授,因不愿签署《行为操守协议书》而遭大学解雇。)

我们并非第一批为此事发声的人,过去三年来,学术人员协会及许多其他关怀此事的人和组织都已经表达了他们促请政府撤销《行为操守协议书》的立场,这份协议书违反了结社及言论自由的基本权利。我们殷切希望,凭藉这份请愿书,能终结《行为操守协议书》,不必再有人为此事烦恼。

我们认为,此事之紧急,不仅仅关乎学术利益,也关乎国家利益;我们促请政府以公正及开明的态度回应,并将大学和国家的利益摆在政治偏见之上。撤销《行为操守协议书》是保障结社与言论自由权利的不再遭受侵蚀的重要一步,让我们的学术人员能扮演他们的正当角色,帮助国家进步。

催生知识赋权公民理性投票
选民设人民国会公民智囊团

http://www.merdekareview.com/

【本刊曾薛霏撰述】公民加上知识,再加上赋权,会产生什么力量?

在第12届全国大选的跫音日益逼近之际,公民社会自发性倡议两项推动民主进程的项目-—“公民智囊团”(Citizen ThinkTank)及“人民国会”(People's Parliament),以经由知识共享与赋权过程提升公民的思想素质,让政治人物知道,人民是国家的核心,人民才是老板。

公民智囊团发 起人洪美发(Sean Ang)和朱巴林(Dzul Bahrin Asmawi)及人民国会发起人哈里斯依布拉欣(Haris Ibrahim),有感选民投选候选人时,一般上对候选人背景和政绩不甚了解,以致无法作明智决定;再加上竞选期很短,套哈里斯的话,情侣从相识到结婚也 需要花很长的时间,人民却得在十天内选出属意的代议士,时间显然不足。

于是,他们决定推动这两个项目,让人民监督代议士的所作所为,并经常与他们对话。

公民智囊团是资讯网站,而人民国会底下的“认识你的国会议员”(Get to Know Your MPs)则实地监督,且不分政党地直接与当地的政治人物对话。

知识赋权的公民

公民智囊团网站已在今年7月7日开始操作,且于上周六(21日)正式推介。“知识赋权的公民”(Knowledge-empowered Citizens)是公民智囊团的口号。

设立公民智囊团是要提供平台让人民参与民主过程,提出及讨论全民关注的议题,并要求参与者大胆地给国州议员打分;在大选来临之际,人民就可从这个网站获知议员们的成绩单,以便理性投票。任何人只需登记为用户,便能参与这个网站的评分和课题讨论。

从实质层面来说,公民智囊团可收集人民的心声及成为政治人物的资料库;但更重要的是,公民智囊团让人们看到一个愿景:藉人民的参与催生懂得善用知识行使投票权的公民。

人民可以凭累积知识理性思考,再投选属意候选人,而不是盲从他人或轻易听信候选人的甜言蜜语。此外,通过这个平台,公民也可以推举候选人,不再限于政党的人选。为了获得人民青睐,领袖素质就得提高,进而杜绝类似在国会大谈“月漏论”的议员。

公民智囊团信托人之一约翰(K.J.John,右图)曾在推介礼上表示,知识型社会(knowledge-based society)完全以资讯和知识力量为推动力,知识成为衡量发展和成长的指标;不过,我国的社会文化设施却还没有建立起来。

他说:“我们太过情绪导向(emotion-driven),或至少我们的领袖都一直认为人民在很多事情上还不够成熟,所以无法讨论敏感或禁忌的课题。但是有知识、能够思考且富有性动力的公民可以平衡这种论调。”

约翰认为,公民智囊团设立了通向塑造知识型社会的平台,这条道路需要公民参与,提出任何他们关心的事。

约翰强调:“我们要一个不同的世界,我们要建立我们的社会文化设施;我们相信每个人民都有权获得正确的资讯。”

选民齐给议员打分

公民智囊团发起人之一Sean Ang发表了公民智囊团网站的概念,这个网站主要是汇集人民对政治人物的看法,为这些政治人物打分,建立网站评分的公信力。同时,希望藉着评分敦促政治人物,改善政府施政。

该组织认为,国会议员是民意代表,人民有权知道议员们有没有兑现竞选承诺,监督政府政策和管理,并与地方领袖密切配合,以充当人民的传声筒。公民智囊团网站也鼓励公民更积极参与国家和地方事务,互相抛出意见和点子,激荡思想。

洪 美发(右图)表示:“我们的评分人员主要分成三组:用户(user)、协调员(moderator)和研究员(researcher)。用户是一般普罗大 众,他们可以打分和提出一些政治人物的课题;协调员则是公民智囊团认识的人,由他们协调网络上的讨论和评分;最后一组是研究员,他们会约见这些政治人物, 把人民的心声传达给对方,他们也会评分。”

“所以,我们无需担心一些政治人物为了让自己的分数比较好看,而雇用一些人给他们打较高的分数;而且,我们也会确保每个人只可以登记为一个用户。”

网站内容基本上分成“政治人物监视者”(Politician Watchdog)及“公民之声”(Citizen Voice)两个栏目。

在“政治人物监视者”栏目中,网站用户可给政治人物的个人资料及政绩打分;此栏目又区分国会议员(依政党归类)、州议员、内阁及州行政议员(依州属归类)。

在“公民之声”栏目,用户可提出及讨论他们关心的课题;此栏目又分成全国、全球、州和地方性议题。

公民智囊团相信,人民是国家的核心,政府和人民之间的权力共享对国家很重要。设立公民智囊团就是为了形塑人民的思想,以公民兼选民的身份作最明智的选择。公民在决定之前已获得充足的资讯,而不是完全依赖猜测或个人情绪做决定。

公民智囊团是以公民为主的项目,完全独立于政党之外;这是建立在网络上的另类和透明的机制,让人民直接参与。

公民力量可推动改变

此外,哈里斯发起的“人民国会”也将与公民智囊团合作。“人民国会”的概念与公民智囊团相似,唯前者凝聚了每个选区至少十位选民,一起讨论选区的课题,再把这些课题传达给议员,要议员回应及采取相应行动处理问题。

选 民将评估议员的回应和表现,再向媒体公布评估结果;若议员的回应怠慢或无意愿协助选民解决问题,选民将在大选时呼吁该区选民别投选同一议员。选民也会以相 同标准评估在野党候选人,若到最后选民发现朝野政党候选人皆素质低落,选民会从公民社会推举替代人选,不让政党候选人专美。

哈里斯(左图)表示:“这两件事是相辅相成的,这十个选民可成为公民智囊团的实地观察者;最重要的是,在选民参与的过程中,可以赋权。”

雪兰莪州八打灵再也南区和北区两个国会选区的“认识你的国会议员”计划已开跑,两组人开始讨论影响该选区的课题。

哈里斯告诉《独立新闻在线》:“选举常看输赢,但我的这个项目不在乎输赢,我要的是推动改变。我知道这种工作需很长时间才能看到成绩,我已经打算长期做这个工作。我要让一些对政府不满的人觉得,我们不是那么无力的,我们可以做些事,推动改变。”

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Konvensyen Rakyat Anjuran BERSIH

Konvensyen Rakyat Anjuran BERSIH

BERSIHKAN PILIHANRAYA

“Kembalikan Hak Rakyat!”

Gabungan Pilihanraya Bersih & Adil (BERSIH) dilancarkan pada 26 November 2006 di Parlimen bertujuan untuk menjalankan pembaharuan kepada sistem pilihanraya di Malaysia.Meskipun sudah 50 tahun Malaysia bebas daripada penjajah British, sistem demokrasi di Malaysia tidak menampakkan satu peningkatan malah semakin menrunsingkan, semakin tidak adil dan kotor.Selepas beberapa dekad kepincangan pengurusan sistem pilihan raya berlaku di negara ini,sekarang tiba masanya bagi rakyat Malaysia mendesak agar pilihan raya yang akan datang ini bersih dan adil selaras dengan dasar negara sebagai sebuah negara demokrasi dan makmur.

Tarikh:

20 Julai 2007

Masa:

8:30 - 11:00pm

Tempat:

Dewan Perhimpunan Cina Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor

No 1, Jalan Maharajalela,
50150 Kuala Lmpur.
(Kg. Attap, sebelah Wisma Pahlawan)
Pemidato:
Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud (MTUC)
Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim
Sdr Lim Guan Eng
Dato Seri Hadi Awang
Dr Nasir Hasim
Yap Swee Seng (SUARAM)
Lim Huat Seng (DEMA)
V. Gayathry (CIJ)
Charles Santiago
Maria Chin Abdullah
Program:
- Kesampaian Tetamu
-Ucapan Pembukaan oleh En. Syed Shahir, Presiden MTUC
- Ucapan dari wakil-wakil NGO
- Persembahan Musik & multimedia
- Ucapan dari pemimpin parti politik
- TAMAT
Untuk maklumat lanjut mengenai Konvensyen, hubungilah Faisal (019-2232002)
Untuk memahami lebih tentang BERSIH, sila lamani sini .

klscahmap.gif

Thursday, July 12, 2007

人民抗争焚化炉胜利 学运:失职官员应赔偿

马来西亚青年及学生民主运动(学运)发表文告表示武来岸焚化炉计划腰斩是人民抗争的胜利。武来岸居民经过五年坚定及持续的斗争,最后不但终于成功捍卫自身家园,更阻止了巴生谷200万人民的食水受到焚化炉排放的二恶英(dioxin)所污染。

学运表示“任何的建设都应以人民最大利益为衡量标准,我国政府在考虑推行任何工程时都不能忽略环境成本及生命的代价”。垃圾焚化炉固然可以帮助处理垃圾,然而政府在没有公布焚化炉的科技背景,合约核准过程及标准,更没有咨询公众意见之下强行推行15亿零吉的焚化炉计划不免让人怀疑此计划是否涉及贪污及滥权问题。

针对我国垃圾量日益增加的问题,学运认为我国政府应采取治本为主,治标为辅的政策。因此政府应趁着土埋垃圾场还能应付垃圾量问题时,把15亿零吉焚化炉计划的资金用来提升人民的环保意识,这包括正规教育,醒觉运动,甚至参考外国立法规定制造大量垃圾的企业工厂缴纳环境税及其他治本政策来控制国内垃圾量问题。

此外,学运表示这案件不应随着武来岸焚化炉计划被终止而结束,因为政府至今都还没交待这计划所牵涉的许多详情,这包括续蒲种及武来岸人民抗争胜利之后,政府是否还会进行该计划,政府在签署合约的过程及标注,甚至政府应公开焚化炉合约让人民监督以确保没有贪污及滥权问题。

针对赔偿问题,学运认为批准该计划的前首相敦马哈迪,现任首相阿都垃及雪州州务大臣基尔应该全面承担所有的赔偿金,以补偿签署危害人民健康的计划,而不是使用人民公款来承担失职官员的过失。最后,学运再度赞扬武来岸居民不屈不挠捍卫权利的精神,并肯定团结的人民将永不被击败!

李发成

组织秘书

马来西亚青年与学生民主运动

012-2536565